http://www.maniacsolutions.com/marketing-solutions-on-yahoo/
Is the stimulus a good idea?
However, I think the stimulus packages and bailouts are just brochure for people (mostly companies) no longer have the money itself for some reason or another, usually their own ruin. But we've been doing this for over a year and does not seem to be working as the market keeps going up and down and every day that a company closes its doors forever and layoffs. Are these solutions, even in the long term? Are these attempts to put us further in debt? It has many of those responsible been punished? I've heard these things the law changes. Is that true, how well These positive changes and are not really hurt us long term? Do not know much about F & B (finance and business), please give me some insight into these things. convince me that is good, I'm convinced that it is bad or something in between and why, I give you 100000000000000000000000000000 pts if you do! lawl this is take 2 from: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/?qid=20090206143819AAC9psZ
NO! It is a horrible idea … PLEASE tell everyone you know to go to these sites … Http://nostimulus.com/ Act Now: Stop the bankruptcy of America http://capwiz.com/americansforprosperity/issues/alert/?alertid=12445656&type=CA Say no to call for stimulus … http://capwiz.com/americansforprosperity/issues/alert/?alertid=12445731&type=ME This fight is not over yet we have two chances to win in the House or Senate! The Senate met 61 votes to squeak through the modified Collins and Nelson, best known as the "compromise" stimulus package. If you listen to mainstream media, this means that the fight is over, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and President Obama wins, and it's time to move on. Not so fast! The bill will go to a conference committee to resolve differences between the House and Senate versions. The Conference Committee will be a new feeding frenzy of the same brand of wasteful pork projects. Whatever comes out of the Commission the Conference will be another very tough vote in the House and Senate. If we keep the pressure on, we can win! What does the so-called "Stimulus Package" Mean to you? It means that you pay. You pay for more bailouts, more gifts, more wasteful spending … and their children and grandchildren pay for billions of dollars debt. But you can fight at this time. By signing the petition, you can join the thousands of Americans who are saying NO! NO more financial rescue funds taxpayers and gifts to special interests! NO using economic difficulties as an excuse for the government of monopolizing power big! NO to the pulsating billion dollars in new debt onto the backs of our children and grandchildren! NO this is no stimulus-scam! Follow the links on the right to contact their elected officials, learn how to tell your friends and family why this new plan will affect taxpayers, and invest in the movement that is fighting! Say No to Senate "compromise" The so-called "compromise" negotiated by Senators Susan Collins and Ben Nelson is almost as bad as previous versions of the stimulus. The bill is touted as a cost "Only" 780 billion U.S. dollars, with every penny paid, which would remain the bill the largest debt in history. The actual cost of bill, however, is even greater! The way official scoring Congressional Budget Office shows that cost $ 838,000,000,000, which is $ 19 billion more than Nancy Pelosi version that passed the House! The changes are reductions in expenses, a little smaller increases just. Senator Harry Reid, noted that all costs in this bill is new spending. Even modest changes is likely to be reversed in conference committee. Senator Carl Levin was on the call log to add a further spending increases within minutes after the lecture "Commitment" was announced. The President Obama promised that the federal government would be more open and transparent and that all legislation would be available to the public 5 days reviewed. we can not slow down and properly assess a measure (including interest) cost taxpayers over a trillion dollars? What's wrong with the stimulus bill? The so-called "stimulus package" is being sold to taxpayers as a useful investment in infrastructure such as roads and bridges. But the facts show otherwise. Only 3.6% of scheme 825 000 000 000 USD price actually go to Real, practical infrastructure projects – roads and bridges. Most of the other 96.4% would go to special interest projects of pets, and putting a "worth years of radical political changes in spending largest and debt scheme in history. Even the Congressional Budget Office, the official scorer of the economic impact of the legislation, has said he would ultimately affect the economy. Why did the leaders of our nation doing this? Obama White House Chief of Staff was surprisingly honest Rahm Emmanuel He said, "Never let a serious crisis … it's a wasted opportunity to do things they could not do previously." Exactly what policies are political fringe of the great government of trying to ram through this massive bill? Under the auspices of a "Comparative Effectiveness Review," the package greatly funds of the first steps toward socialization and government-mandated rationing health care. And this is just one of many government power grab are shoehorned in so-called Stimulus Package. " In fact, even for charity estimates, the bill would require taxpayers to pay the bill of at least 600,000 new government bureaucrats. That's six tenths of a million people on the payroll of government – the addition of little or no value to our economy and paid with billions of dollars of tax on the cattle-drive. What kinds of gifts from special interests and wasteful spending government are included in the "Stimulus Package"? " To name just a few … – $ 4,190,000,000 in funds earmarked for ACORN, the wing left advocacy group best known for allegations of electoral fraud during the 2008 presidential campaign – $ 600 million to buy new cars at the bureaucrats Government – $ 335,000,000 for adult sex shops (one of the few games that could possibly provide "stimulus") – $ 150 million bee for sure – $ 2,800,000,000 for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in a misguided program is likely to be spent to build broadband unnecessary Internet services in urban areas than in rural areas deprived of services. These are just some examples of blatant greed that take place in halls of Congress today with the "Stimulus Package." This debt billion and expenditure patterns provide little or no encouragement, but will every U.S. household at least $ 6,700 in new debt to be paid by our children and grandchildren. stimulate an economy can not work. Every dollar the government spends coming from the private sector. Nobel laureate Milton Friedman, winner famously said: "no such thing as a free lunch." Government spending is financed through of either higher taxes, increased federal borrowing, or printing money. Those are the only possibilities. They believe the economic damage that any effect of stimulating new spending. ● raise taxes reduce the incentive to work, save and invest. There is a strong association between increased tax and reduces economic growth. In an economic crisis, higher taxes should be unthinkable. The Revenue Act of 1932 was one of the main economic reasons deepened a crisis in the Great Depression. ● borrowing from the State also takes the money from the private economy, the money that the hand of buyers government bonds in exchange for bonds. That money could otherwise be used for business investment that could expand the productive capacity of the economy. If funds are provided from abroad, our exports are reduced due to U.S. $ are being used to buy bonds instead of goods. borrowed funds on loan must also be paid by placing a burden on taxpayers in the future. excessive debt may also increase interest rates, deepening the credit crisis. ● The inflation may be the funding mechanisms more harmful to everyone. If the government spends money that has not taxed or borrowed, then is literally creating money from nothing. More dollars are created means that the dollars in their pockets and bank accounts are worth less than they were earlier. Inflation is a stealth tax that erodes the value of everything and destroys real economic growth. 2. History shows that spending stimulus fails. America experienced with large scale expansion of public spending in the 1930s with the New Deal and again in the 1960s and '70s with the Great Society. These dramatic expansion spending public coincided with economic failure. The long boom that began under Reagan and continued until now with only two brief, mild recessions coincided with a significant drop in federal spending as a percentage of the economy. 3. Infrastructure projects should be judged on their merits, not as a stimulus. There is a role for the government in the provision of certain public goods that the market can not provide efficiently. If funding is available on favorable terms can make sense to have a long-term and begin projects that are legitimately justified on their merits. We should be in no mistake, however, that construction spending public is encouraging, because dollars are paid private sector removed. It works! Making an Impact: Join the more than 200,000 Americans have signed this petition! How? Only Government can break the vicious circles that are crippling our economy. – President Barack Obama Expert Analysis: Tax cuts are preferable to the costs, especially the many programs that will undoubtedly be the result of this process. Even the president-designate of the CEA considers Obama that increased taxes reduce growth. – James Butkiewicz, Professor of Economics, University of Delaware
Yahoo Store, Yahoo Store Design & Development